Realty Roundup

This report was compiled from the Wisconsin Department of Revenue Integrated Property Assessment System. There were 164 documents recorded for The City of Racine between April 1, 2013 and April 30, 2013.

The Complete listing of properties can be found by clicking HERE.

In April there were 51 foreclosures bringing the total  to 167 for the first 4 months of 2013. Many of the foreclosures are rental properties, and occasionally there is a foreclosure on a large block of rentals with the same owner.  It is just another effect of the continuing unemployment situation in Racine. People are leaving Racine, which is creating a surplus of housing, driving down prices, and unsaleable homes are simply  abandoned. This is a growing problem which won’t go away.

detroit 3

Milwaukee acknowledges it’s growing problem. When will Racine?

Milwaukee becomes reluctant landlord

May 8 2013 From the Journal Sentinel:

It could be your elderly neighbor who exhausted her savings and had no one to turn to. Or it might have been the couple down the street who were jobless for months.

And now they’re gone, another tax foreclosure statistic that leaves the city holding the bag.

While mortgage foreclosure rates have stabilized somewhat in the area, tax foreclosures have given Milwaukee this dubious distinction: It may be the biggest landlord in the city.

The city holds title to nearly 1,000 homes. These are homes the city took over because the owner was delinquent in paying taxes.

A tax foreclosure, which can play out over several years, is different from a bank-owned foreclosure in which a bank or other lender forecloses on a property owner. In a tax foreclosure, it’s the city that ends up with the property.

While the city has its hands full with more than 1,500 bank-owned foreclosures, the number of tax foreclosures is worsening. City Treasurer Spencer Coggs anticipates his office will start the tax foreclosure process for more than 1,300 additional properties before the year is over.

“The numbers are alarming,” Coggs said. “People lose their jobs. You want to help people keep the home they have. We don’t want their home; we just want them to pay their taxes.”

“We don’t want to be in the landlord business,” said Martha Brown, deputy commissioner of the Department of City Development, which has the unenviable task of trying to sell the homes the city now owns.

“We are taking a lot of homes from the elderly,” Taylor said.

One employee in the treasurer’s office, where taxes are paid, told aldermen at a recent meeting that some employees have tears in their eyes when they take phone calls from people unable to pay their taxes.

“It’s a huge neighborhood problem to have those vacant properties that are not contributing anything to the quality of the neighborhood,” Brown said. “They’re actually detracting.”

Worse, some of the homes are immediate candidates for demolition, Brown says. Art Dahlberg, commissioner of the city’s Department of Neighborhood Services, has a list of 500 homes he would like to demolish immediately. And that list isn’t going to disappear anytime soon as more distressed properties end up in tax foreclosure.

Since the housing crisis took hold in 2008, the city has seen tax foreclosures increase alarmingly. In 2007, the city acquired 155 properties throughout the city. The next year it went up to 184 parcels acquired. The city acquired 461 properties in 2009, 532 in 2010, 597 in 2011 and 744 properties last year.

MvR

Seeking economic insight, Walker, Cabinet secretaries visit city

May 7, 2013 From The JT

RACINE — Gov. Scott Walker took his Cabinet “on the road” Monday, kicking off a series of statewide economic listening sessions at Modine Manufacturing Co. to learn how the state can best help create jobs. His answer came from the Racine County Economic Development Corp.’s Gordy Kacala, who presented alongside a representative from the Kenosha Area Business Alliance. According to Kacala, Racine County’s biggest economic challenge, particularly in terms of unemployment, remains the City of Racine.  “People are engaged and using a variety of strategies” to combat the city unemployment rates, Kacala said, “But it’s just going to take us some time to make a change in the community.” The pressing issue is an education system that doesn’t prepare potential employees to qualify for open jobs, Kacala said, meaning that many open positions get filled from outside county lines. What the government can do, Kacala said, is continue to work with the county to offer tax incentives to incoming companies, something he said many have come to expect. For developers, there’s a pervasive idea that “if you’re not asking for significant incentives, you’re missing the boat,” Kacala said. “Unfortunately, it’s still ‘show us the money.’ ” Kacala, RCEDC’s executive director, noted a shortage in vacant industrial land, concerns about uncertainty surrounding the federal health care law and immigration policy as other places the government can provide answers and assistance.

Why can’t Gordy Kacala come out and say the truth? RACINE CAN’T COMPETE! The decline is terminal! I can only guess that the truth would eliminate Gordy’s taxpayer dependent job.

The former IPS Binding and Stitchery Plant – 3911 N. Memorial Dr. Fair – 2011 Assessed value of $3.5M Property taxes = $98,571.

3911 Memorial

The Sportplex at 10116 Stellar Dr. – 2011 Assessed value  of $5.4M. Property taxes = $115,610.

10116 Stellar Dr.

Something happened to the assessed value of 3911 S. Memorial Dr. The assessed value dropped from 2011 to 2012 by $1.9M. It was in 2010 that IPS was bought out by Deluxe Stitcher  and closed.

IPS

Per Wisconsin DOR,  machinery and equipment used exclusively and directly in the manufacturing process is already exempt from property taxes. IPS was already gone  – when Cumberland Packing Corp bought the building.  Coincidentally,  Cumberland Packing Corp also owns the property at 2330 Chickory Road (Butter Buds),  which has also received a significant drop in assessed value and taxpayer assistance because Racine tax-rates makes the company non-competitive and unprofitable!

BB2

HEY GORDY – let me tell you the secret to Racine’s failures -  IT’S THE TAXRATES! Racine can’t compete!

3911 Memorial 2

Read more about Butter Bud’s ability to leverage the City HERE.    Butter  Bud’s is correct about Tax Hell Racine! However every Business and Resident is suffering from Racine’s Tax and Develop crowd that is ensconced at City Hall!

After viewing the above property records – did RDA’s Brian O’Connell say this with a straight face?

The city property tax break will apply to the existing Butter Buds and the building to be acquired, O’Connell said. Together they now pay a combined $71,947 in property taxes. Seventy-five percent of that figure over 10 years equals a $539,603 rebate.

The rebate will come from the Intergovernmental Sewer Revenue Sharing Fund which was designed to be used for economic development. So the rebate would not affect the city budget, O’Connell noted.

Really? It actually appears that the General Revenue would be shorted by $50,000/yr by lowering the assessed value of 3911 S. Memorial Dr.

May 14,2013 From The JT:

“At our meeting on April 29, we also considered this section of the ordinance … We determined that what it means is that the officer or employee took an existing record of some kind and altered it so that it was no longer accurate,” ethics board Chairman Mary Wyant said Monday. “It does not mean that the officer or employee said or wrote something that was not factually correct.”

It’s just part of everyday business for City of Racine officials to lie.

Another hard lesson for Milwaukee – will Racine listen?

Sweet Water Organics ceases production, owes city $137,000

Bay View firm raised fish, grew produce for area restaurants through urban farm system

May 10,2013 From the Journal Sentinel:

Sweet Water Organics Inc. has ceased production and can’t pay back over $137,000 from a city loan, says a new report to the Milwaukee Common Council.

The council’s Community and Economic Development Committee will consider a proposal Monday to take possession of a tractor and other equipment used by Sweet Water as collateral.

The city would lease or sell that equipment, which includes a compost mixer and aquaponics system, with the proceeds reducing what Sweet Water owes, said the Department of City Development proposal. The remaining amount owed would be written off as a loss.

Sweet Water operated at a Bay View industrial building, 2151 S. Robinson Ave., where it raised fish and grew produce for area restaurants. It used an urban farm system known as aquaponics, which uses fish waste to help fertilize produce, with the produce helping to filter the water used to raise the fish.

The council voted 14-1 in 2011 to approve a $250,000 forgivable loan to Sweet Water. The company spent $206,699, with the remaining funds returned to the city.

Department officials opposed the loan, citing changing plans for the cash, and a high cost to city taxpayers for each job the company said it would create.

To avoid making annual loan payments, Sweet Water was required to have 10 employees by the end of 2011; 21 by the end of 2012; 35 in 2013; and 45 in 2014. Sweet Water met its 2011 job target, allowing the company to skip its first $62,500 loan payment.

But a Journal Sentinel article in April 2012 raised questions about how that target was met.

Workforce numbers were boosted by including Sweet Water’s two founders, who hadn’t drawn salaries until job numbers were certified by the city. Also, wages paid by Sweet Water were far below what the company had projected.

At the end of 2012, Sweet Water had only 2.35 jobs – allowing it to skip just $6,994 of this year’s loan payment.

Sweet Water doesn’t have the cash to repay the outstanding loan balance of $137,205, according to the department proposal. That document doesn’t indicate how much the city hopes to recover by selling or leasing the company’s equipment.

Sweet Water officials in February told committee members they wanted to change the loan’s terms.

OH! The IRONY in Real Racist Racine!

Alderman “Lying Jim Kaplan” argues against allowing Northwest Funeral Home to purchase the Woman’s Club at 740 Lake Avenue. Northwest Funeral Home is owned by African Americans. Despite having ZERO experience in operating a funeral home,  Alderman “Lying Jim Kaplan” expresses concerns on how the owners will move caskets around inside the building! How blatant must the racism be before it is called?

In a perpetually dying  Downtown Racine that has been yearly dependent upon millions of $$$ worth of taxpayer funded welfare and is filled with vacant and crumbling buildings,  life imitates art as members of Racine’s  “Whites Only” Downtown business owners, Aldermen, Commission Members and even Mayor John Dickert worked together overtime to deny  Northwest Funeral Home a place in Downtown Racine IN SPITE of meeting every demand put on them.

City Plan Commission Feb. 29,2012:

Mr. Sadowski reviewed the options presented by the applicant for staging and routes for processions provided. He also read comments, both for and against, this use. Some of the ‘against’ comments include concerns about parking, viability of the shuttle service, the unknown of how many attendees may be present at the funerals, traffic concerns, especially if there are 2 funerals at one time, traffic management, negative impact on neighboring businesses, competition for parking on Main Street, and the viability of the staging plans.

Mayor Dickert also reiterated the public concern about the parking issues, and that the shuttle service may not be feasible. (is there a list available of  those who comprised the unnamed “concerned public”, and why isn’t the Mayor taking up the cause of the “concerned public” that doesn’t want to pay John Dickert’s legal bills?)

Commissioner Sutton Ekes noted she too is conflicted about the proposal, stating she is familiar with the parking issues downtown, which is common down there, and any use of the structure is going to cause a parking concern.

Why didn’t Mayor Dickert, Alderman “Lying Jim Kaplan” , Sutton Ekes and the Common Council just come out and say it?

Shortly after Northwest Funeral Home is denied permission to purchase 740 Lake Ave, Marsh-Meredith & Acklam Funeral Home purchases the Woman’s Club at 740 Lake Avenue.  Marsh-Meredith is WHITE owned. If, as Commissioner Sutton Ekes stated, that  “any use” of the structure is going to cause a parking problem, why is the structure still there? Is there a future use possible that is RACE Based?

Jan 31, 2013 From The JT

The Woman’s Club held an estate sale in January 2011 and has since sold its building, located at 740 Lake Ave. and now owned by (White) Maresh-Meredith & Acklam Funeral Home, Jansson said.

 The Woman’s Club is sold at a $25,000 LOSS!

WC2WC1

Shortly after the sale, an odd thing happened. The “special assessments” figure was lowered! It may be legitimate – but why? Who else is experiencing a decrease in taxes? From 2008-2011 there is a yearly increase.

A

In 2012 after Marsh-Meredith & Acklam purchases the the property, the “special assessment” drops. If Northwest Funeral Home had purchased the property it would have lost it’s tax exempt status and contributed to the tax base. Why has Marsh-Meredith & Acklam been allowed to retain the privilege of a tax-exempt property?

M5

The Marsh-Meredith & Acklan property at 803 Main St. was given an Assessed value of $810,000 in 2007. It has not increased since then! Didn’t Brian O’Connell and Matt Sadowoski  recently claim some success in Downtown Racine and declare property values are rising? How come the property values at  Maresh-Meredith don’t reflect that success? Why do they get a break on the ever increasing property taxes others in Racine must pay?

MM2012

MM 2007

Some of the Speakers for and against allowing an African-American owned funeral parlor in Downtown Racine.

 

racism racine

From TMJ 4:

RACINE - A new report accuses one local community of squeezing out minorities while re-developing its downtown.  One Racine business owner says discrimination and racism are alive and well in Downtown Racine.  The report calls downtown stakeholders modern day plantation owners, using slave catchers to do their bidding.

Click HERE to read the Report.

One question that comes to my mind is: Why are properties in CERTAIN neighborhoods assessed at THREE TIMES their sales price, while properties in OTHER areas, like North Bay, are assessed closer to their ACTUAL sale price, and Gaslight Drive properties are UNDER valued? Are City of Racine officials targeting certain neighborhoods for elimination via property assessments?

Meanwhile:

Dickert opposed to counting fees in property tax limits

May 10,2013 From The JT:

MADISON — The Legislature’s Joint Finance Committee voted Thursday to tighten the leash on local property tax limits, fueling Mayor John Dickert’s assertion that cities will have to resort to “the one thing that is left — cut services.”

Dickert said, “There’s only one thing that is left — cut services.”

shining

In Mayor John Dickert’s scandal plagued Racine – this just in!

In RE the marriage of Marcia Lynn Mozol and Robert Edward Mozol

Racine County Case Number 2012FA001423

Bob Mozol

Is it related to THIS?

Bob and Melissa

Adultry is a FELONY in Wisconsin.

944.16 Adultery. Whoever does either of the following is guilty of a Class I felony:

(1) A married person who has sexual intercourse with a person not the married person’s spouse; or
(2) A person who has sexual intercourse with a person who is married to another.

A tribute to all those City Hall Dogs who visit Reichert Court to watch the Submarine Races and re-live those High School Daze!!

reichert ct

Cue Anne!

Runnin’ With The Devil

Racine

Appleton Unemployment (blue) is 9%. Racine Unemployment is 13.4% (red)

AR unemp

Populations are near equal. What’s unknown is how many more thousands of the unemployed have left Racine since 2011. Abandoned and empty houses are everywhere. Racine is actively tearing down abandoned buildings.

pop data

Appleton 2013 General Revenue Fund: $57,489,592

appleton general fund

Racine 2013 General Revenue Fund: $82,511,652

racine 1

Appleton 2013   Tax Levy: $37,260,671

Appelton

Racine 2013 Tax Levy: $52,600,694

r3

Appleton 2011 Household Income: $58,172

a1

Racine 2011 Household Income: $52,582

ri

Appelton has low taxes and low government spending. Racine taxes businesses and residents out of existence. Does this matter?

appleton a

When you find Hwy 20 Exit 333 you know you are halfway to Racine Tax Hell!

??????????

Hwy 20 ends in Racine Tax Hell!

dickertdevil a

Where’s the Return? Was it an INVESTMENT, or just more wasteful SPENDING? The businesses and residents that are leaving will be PERMANENT. The decline is terminal, because Racine can’t compete. It’s not even in the running.

debt

O!

From: of two minds.com     by charles hughes smith

The Proper Use of Credit

The key to the proper use of credit is that it is invested in productive enterprises at a high rate of return. Risk cannot be eliminated, it can only be suppressed or transferred to others. This is the lesson of Benoit Mandelbrot’s masterpiece, The Misbehavior of Markets: A Fractal View of Financial Turbulence.

All the complex machinations of the financial magicians in the 2000s to eliminate risk failed, for the profound reasons Mandelbrot explains.

A high rate of return (i.e. a high interest rate) leads lenders to transparently accept risk, and entrepreneurs to only borrow for the highest-return enterprises. A low-yield, high-risk investment is not worth funding. We call these mal-investments or unproductive uses of capital.

In our era, the Federal Reserve and Federal policies have massively incentivized mal-investment and unproductive uses of capital. Low interest rates destroy the needed discipline on both lenders and borrowers to only risk capital in the highest-return, lowest risk uses.

The Keynesian Cargo Cult’s blind spot is they do not distinguish between productive and unproductive uses of capital. A bridge to nowhere is equally as worthy as a truly productive investment to Keynesians, because their cult believes that any borrowed-and-spent money is equally good at boosting their false idol, “aggregate demand.”

But a truly productive investment of capital has a multiplier effect; it stimulates not just consumption but increased output and productivity. Mal-investments (duplicate MRI tests, McMansions built in the middle of nowhere, etc.) have no multiplier effect because they are simply forms of consumption–they are not even investments, though they are presented as investments by those feeding at the Federal/Federal Reserve trough of zero-interest credit and “free money” distributed by the government.

For credit to be productive, there must first be productive uses for the capital. In an economy with over-capacity in virtually every sector, a massive surplus of labor, a predatory financial sector and a grossly inefficient government in thrall to crony-capitalist cartels, truly productive investments are few and far between.

Instead we borrow trillions of dollars to squander on wasteful consumption and claim it’s an “investment.” Consumption is not investment, but this simple truth is taboo in our financialized, centrally planned Empire of Mis-Allocated Capital.

The Impact of high taxes hits Milwaukee as hard as Racine:

Karen Taylor, property disposition manager at DCD, said that in many cases, family members are not helping out their elderly mothers and fathers who can’t keep up the payments.

“We are taking a lot of homes from the elderly,” Taylor said.

One employee in the treasurer’s office, where taxes are paid, told aldermen at a recent meeting that some employees have tears in their eyes when they take phone calls from people unable to pay their taxes.

May 8 2013 From the JSOnline:

Milwaukee becomes reluctant landlord

It could be your elderly neighbor who exhausted her savings and had no one to turn to. Or it might have been the couple down the street who were jobless for months.

And now they’re gone, another tax foreclosure statistic that leaves the city holding the bag.

While mortgage foreclosure rates have stabilized somewhat in the area, tax foreclosures have given Milwaukee this dubious distinction: It may be the biggest landlord in the city.

The city holds title to nearly 1,000 homes. These are homes the city took over because the owner was delinquent in paying taxes.

A tax foreclosure, which can play out over several years, is different from a bank-owned foreclosure in which a bank or other lender forecloses on a property owner. In a tax foreclosure, it’s the city that ends up with the property.

While the city has its hands full with more than 1,500 bank-owned foreclosures, the number of tax foreclosures is worsening. City Treasurer Spencer Coggs anticipates his office will start the tax foreclosure process for more than 1,300 additional properties before the year is over.

Not all of those properties will end up in tax foreclosure, as some property owners will find a way to pay up and avoid losing their homes. But a majority will ultimately end up in the city’s hands.

“The numbers are alarming,” Coggs said. “People lose their jobs. You want to help people keep the home they have. We don’t want their home; we just want them to pay their taxes.”

“We don’t want to be in the landlord business,” said Martha Brown, deputy commissioner of the Department of City Development, which has the unenviable task of trying to sell the homes the city now owns.

Mike Ruzicka, the head of the Greater Milwaukee Association of Realtors, says there are real-estate firms that hold many multifamily units in the city.

“But in terms of single-family homes, I can’t think of anybody other than Milwaukee that has more homes,” Ruzicka said.

Karen Taylor, property disposition manager at DCD, said that in many cases, family members are not helping out their elderly mothers and fathers who can’t keep up the payments.

“We are taking a lot of homes from the elderly,” Taylor said.

Dickert opposed to counting fees in property tax limits

May 10,2013 From The JT

MADISON — The Legislature’s Joint Finance Committee voted Thursday to tighten the leash on local property tax limits, fueling Mayor John Dickert’s assertion that cities will have to resort to “the one thing that is left — cut services.”

Dickert said, “There’s only one thing that is left — cut services.”

Turn off the lights

Where Have All The Good Times Gone?

k v r

AN updated look at the unemployment situation: Kenosha in blue, Racine in red

UR

Updated population data

Pop

Kenosha VS. Racine. Now that the 2013 Adopted Budgets are in – it’s time to compare spending and services. Kenosha starts off with a population that is larger – by 20,885 and 5.3 sq. miles more area than Racine.

k1

Kenosha 2013  General Revenue Fund: $72,000,543

k3

Racine 2013 General Revenue Fund: $82,511,652

racine 1

r2

Kenosha 2013 Tax Levy: $46,135,324

r4

Racine 2013 Tax Levy: $52,600,694

r3

Something has happened to Racine…. what could it be?

Dickert

June 25,2009 from The JT:

Dickert’s pick for city administrator: Friedel

RACINE – Mayor John Dickert announced Tom Friedel as his choice for city administrator Thursday.

“The people of this city – they’re looking for a new direction but also want to know that the person running the city is someone they trust,” Dickert said. “I think this is a win-win for everybody.”

John and Tom, aided by Alderman Greg Helding and Alderman Jim Kaplan have truly moved Racine in a new direction!

The “NEW direction” of Racine :

debt

Debt has EXPLODED! But where’s the increased TAX BASE? The upcoming Dickert Disaster will be an intergenerational  catastrophe which will crush Racine’s future under an unbearable load of debt and lead to default! 

Merry-Christmas-christmas-465663_1024_768

UPDATE – The consequences of LYING officials heading government! Is Racine next? Call Alderman Lying Jim Kaplan @ 262-632-3085 and ask him:

sec1

sec 2h2

Therefore, the SEC’s order finds that at a time of increased interest in the Harrisburg’s financial health due to the deteriorating financial condition of The Harrisburg Authority, the city created a risk that investors could purchase or sell securities in the secondary market on the basis of incomplete and outdated information. For current information, investors had to review other public statements from the city about its fiscal situation. For example, Harrisburg’s 2009 budget and its accompanying transmittal letter were accessible on Harrisburg’s website. By the time the 2009 budget was passed, Harrisburg was aware of the Authority’s projected budget deficits and that Dauphin County was challenging a rate increase. As a result, the Authority was unlikely to have sufficient revenues to pay its 2009 debt service obligations. However, Harrisburg’s 2009 budget as adopted did not include funds for debt guarantee payments. The 2009 budget also misstated Harrisburg’s credit as being rated “Aaa” by Moody’s when in fact Moody’s had downgraded Harrisburg’s general obligation credit rating to Baa1 by December 2008.

According to the SEC’s order, another public statement available to investors on the city’s website was the annual State of the City address delivered on April 9, 2009. The address only discussed the municipal resource recovery facility as a situation that was an “additional challenge” and an “issue that can be resolved.” The address was misleading because it failed to mention that by this time, Harrisburg had already made $1.8 million in guarantee payments on the resource recovery facility bond debt. It also omitted the total amount of the debt that the city would likely have to repay from its general fund. By this time, Harrisburg knew that the Authority had failed to secure the requested rate increase, making it likely that Harrisburg would have to repay $260 million of the debt as guarantor.

According to the SEC’s order, Harrisburg’s 2009 mid-year fiscal report available on its website was designed to provide a snapshot of budget-to-actual figures at the middle of the year. However, the report did not reference any of the guarantee payments the city had made on the municipal resource recovery facility debt, which at this mid-year point totaled $2.3 million (7 percent of its general fund expenditures).

The SEC’s order requires Harrisburg to cease and desist from committing or causing violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5. The city neither admits nor denies the findings in the order. In the settlement, the SEC considered Harrisburg’s cooperation in the investigation and the various remedial measures implemented by the city to prevent further securities laws violations.

The SEC’s investigation was conducted by members of the Enforcement Division’s Municipal Securities and Public Pensions Unit including Senior Enforcement Counsel Yolanda Gonzalez and Assistant Director Ivonia K. Slade with assistance from Municipal Securities Specialist Jonathan D. Wilcox. The investigation was supervised by Unit Chief Elaine C. Greenberg and Deputy Chief Mark R. Zehner.

* * *

In its Report of Investigation to address the secondary market disclosure responsibilities of public officials when they make public statements about a municipal issuer, the SEC notes that public officials should be mindful that their written or oral public statements may affect the total mix of information available to investors. This could result in anti-fraud liability under the federal securities laws for the public officials making such statements if they are materially misleading or omit material information.

The report further states that public officials should consider taking steps to reduce the risk of misleading investors. At a minimum, they should consider adopting policies and procedures that are reasonably designed to result in accurate, timely, and complete public disclosures; identifying those persons involved in the disclosure process; evaluating other public disclosures including financial information made by the municipal issuer; and assuring that responsible individuals receive adequate training about their obligations under the federal securities laws.

foreclosure

Click on image to enlarge

city of racine debt

purchase

LIBRARY UPDATE:

The City of Racine funds one Library and one Bookmobile, with part of the funding coming from the Racine Area Intergovernmental Sanitary Sewer Service, Revenue Sharing, Cooperation and Settlement Agreement dated April 25, 2002.

sewer agreement

Are funds being misdirected in violation of the agreement?

April 11,2013 From The JT:

RACINE — City buildings would be closed three more days this year and residents could see slower snow removal and street maintenance under a proposed amendment to the city’s 2013 spending plan…

MEANWHILE Kenosha funds 4 libraries and a bookmobile.

123

Meanwhile Racine funds Doug Nicholson’s pet project:

facade grant 2

dn1

A Matter of Trust

Closure: A necessary part of every major event…

CAR25 ethics complaints dismissed

ethics 4

Watch the Ethics Board Video HERE.

bopard of ethics

April 30,2013 From The JT

RACINE — The city’s Board of Ethics decided Monday to dismiss a series of complaints alleging ethics rules violations made by Racine officials during the process of outsourcing operations at CAR25…

Can you say – KANGAROO COURT?

A kangaroo court is “a mock court in which the principles of law and justice are disregarded or perverted”.[1] It is essentially where the defendant has already been deemed innocent, and isn’t required to defend himself.

Ethics Board says county Supervisor Peggy Romo West committed ethics violations

April 25, 2013 From the Journal – Sentinal

The Milwaukee County Ethics Board found that Supervisor Peggy Romo West committed two minor ethics violations in 2011, according to records released by the board this week.

Romo West violated a ban on using her office to campaign by wearing a campaign T-shirt while riding in a county vehicle in a Labor Day Parade, the board found. In addition, she violated ethics rules by posting campaign-related messages on Facebook while at the courthouse.

The board agreed to dismiss the complaints, based on Romo West’s agreement at a closed hearing last September to refrain from any future incidents.

As part of the deal dismissing the complaints, Romo West agreed to maintain three separate Facebook accounts – one for her campaign; one for her County Board job; and a personal page. She also agreed “not to post any information to any site regarding campaigning while on county time,” according to the Ethics Board action.

A complaint against Romo West alleging ethics violations was filed by Sylvia Ortiz, who ran unsuccessfully against Romo West for a board seat in April 2012.

Closure.

 It’s a necessary part of every major event. Unfortunately, Racine has been repeatedly denied closure in the case that has torn a Community apart -

William Bielefeldt vs. John T Dickert et al

Racine County Case Number 2011CV001078

DK1

RESULTS:

Mayor’s slander lawsuit costs city’s taxpayers $100,000

May 13, 2012 From The JT

RACINE — The slander suit against Mayor John Dickert has cost the city $100,000.

Attorneys’ bills to the city for the suit amounted to $107,718.74 before insurance kicked in after the $100,000 deductible was reached, according to records of financial transactions released to The Journal Times this week. The Journal Times had filed an open records request asking for the city’s records pertaining to a recent settlement between Dickert and the plaintiff and for financial transactions among all involved parties.

That cost included $92,898.91 for defending Dickert in the slander suit and $14,819.83 for Dickert’s third party complaint against the city asking them to pick up the tab.

The City Council decided last year to cover the costs, citing the state statute of indemnification that requires municipalities to cover legal costs for employees acting in official capacity, unless the court found Dickert was acting otherwise. Then he would have had to pay the city back.

But the suit was settled before the court could rule whether Dickert was acting as a public official or a private citizen when he made the allegedly slanderous comments about former city employee William Bielefeldt while on the radio last year during his mayoral campaign.

“There was no finding by the court on that issue at all,” Deputy City Attorney Scott Letteney said Friday. “Since there was no finding, the repayment agreement was not triggered.”

Alderman Greg Helding said it’s “absurd” there’s any question whether Dickert was speaking as mayor when he commented about the city’s Neighborhood Stabilization Program, saying he believed Dickert had been acting as an elected official talking about official business.

Alderman Mike Shields believed the mayor had not been in his official capacity and that he should reimburse the city.

“We’ve got to be fair across the board to everybody,” he said. “There’s no free rides for anybody. I sympathize for the mayor, but he wasn’t acting in his official capacity so why should the city foot the bill?

City Council President Jim Kaplan disagreed.

“Elected officials are in their position 24/7, 365 days a year,” Kaplan said. “It’s an unfortunate situation. Sometimes the cost of doing business is hard to digest.”

Most aldermen declined to comment or could not be reached Friday.

$$$$ Dickert declined to comment for this story $$$$

SO – There are 2 Aldermen who justify spending taxpayer money to defend John Dickert, who is alleged to have committed  an intentional tort while campaigning, 1 Alderman who believes in fair play and closure for the Taxpayers, A Deputy City Attorney who says that no legal determination of John Dickert’s status has been declared, and a Mayor who declines comment.

Why would Alderman Greg Helding oppose closure for the taxpayers and a legal ruling on John Dickert’s status? It would be a simple matter for the City to request a Declaratory Judgement as the fact that John Dickert made those remarks while  campaigning on a local Radio station does not appear to be in dispute.

Was Alderman Greg Heldings opinion INFLUENCED by a future promise of employment with The City of Racine?  Greg Helding’s Linked in Profile.

H1

H2

Have there been discussions between Mayor John Dickert, the City Attorney, and Aldermen Greg Helding, with a promise of future employment with the City? Is this influencing actions taken by the parties involved? Is this in the residents best interest? What is Alderman Helding alluding to by his statement that my journey from coucil to counsel will be complete?  Is there a promise of conditionary employment? Is that legal?  Why is Aldermen Helding OPPOSSED to a ruling on John Dickert’s status?

H3

What about Aldermen Jim Kaplan? Why is he OPPOSSED to a ruling on John Dickerts status? How can Alderman Kaplan be trusted when he LIED about online threats:

Council President Jim Kaplan says recently, online threats have been made against city leaders.

“I think we`ve seen things that have happened in Colorado and other places where public servants have been shot down because of judgments they`ve made,” Kaplan said.

Jim Kaplan likes to wear his “Christian” religion on his sleeve – so how does he justify LYING when:

A Dozen Reasons God Hates Lying & Liars

Deception, in one form or another, is a regular part of many people’s lives in our world today. However, much to the church’s shame, many Christians continue to give in to the temptation to lie their way through life as well. What does God think of this? Proverbs 6:19 includes on the list of things that God hates, “a false witness who utters lies.” Why does God hate lying? And why does he not only hate lying, but liars as well? The Bible provides many reasons. Here are twelve of them… Click HERE to see all 12.

2. Lying reveals a lack of godliness.

He who speaks truth tells what is right, but a false witness, deceit (Prov. 12:17).

A righteous man hates falsehood, but a wicked man acts disgustingly and shamefully (Prov. 13:5).

Do Liars provide cover for Liars? Of course they do.

Is it more than a coincidence that  Mayor John Dickert’s two staunchest supporters, Alderman Greg Helding and Alderman Jim Kaplan were successive  Presidents of the Common Council and that there opinions were instrumental is influencing the Common Council to pay for  John Dickert’s legal bills?

April 18, 2012 from The JT

RACINE — Alderman Jim Kaplan was elected City Council President at Tuesday’s City Council meeting. He will take the reigns from former City Council President Greg Helding.

UPDATE: May 3,2013

jim-kaplan 2

 

YET -  Alderman Shields  was adamant in his opinion,  which most  residents would agree with:

Alderman Mike Shields believed the mayor had not been in his official capacity and that he should reimburse the city.

“We’ve got to be fair across the board to everybody,” he said. “There’s no free rides for anybody. I sympathize for the mayor, but he wasn’t acting in his official capacity so why should the city foot the bill?

Unfortunately for the citizens of Racine, Alderman Shields opinion was cast aside and the Common Council decided to pay John Dickert’s legal bills without proper adjudication.

The issue was allowed to fester, until The JT wanted to know the terms of the settlement:

June 16, 2012 from The JT

On May 24 The Journal Times filed the records request with the city and Dickert separately contending the settlement is presumed public and subject to disclosure because it “obviously involved the expenditure of public money — either directly or indirectly (via insurance coverage),” citing the 1994 decision.

“We believe it is the public’s right to know what city officials are doing and what it is costing the taxpayers, whether it be for legal bills, insurance costs — now and down the road — or costs of settlements,” Journal Times Editor Steve Lovejoy said. “How else can the public judge whether city officials are acting in their best interests unless they conduct government in an open and honest manner?”

“We think we’re required to turn over (the settlement to The Journal Times),” Deputy City Attorney Scott Lettney said Friday. He is representing the city and the mayor in the declaratory judgment complaint. “We don’t know what we’re supposed to do. Therefore we’re asking the court … to examine the situation and tell everyone what we’re supposed to do. We don’t know how it’s going to turn out.”

In the slander suit Bielefeldt filed against Dickert last year claiming the mayor defamed him in radio comments he made while campaigning for re-election, the parties reached a settlement in late April days before the scheduled jury trial. The more than yearlong suit had cost the city’s taxpayers $100,000 in legal fees before its liability insurance kicked in, according to previous records released to The Journal Times.

However, while Judge Ptacek ordered the settlement deal to be released, John Dickert’s status has not been definitevely adjudicated:

January 25, 2013 from The JT

RACINE — The settlement agreement that ended a former city employee’s slander suit against Mayor John Dickert is a public record and must released to the public, Racine Circuit Court Judge Gerald Ptacek ruled Friday.

William Bielefeldt sued Dickert in 2011 claiming the mayor defamed him in radio comments he made while campaigning for re-election. The parties reached a settlement in late April, just days before a scheduled jury trial. The lawsuit cost city taxpayers $100,000 in legal fees.

Ptacek stated that one of the main questions the court needed to find an answer to was whether Dickert was acting in his official capacity as mayor or as an individual when he made the radio comments or signed the settlement agreement.

“This is not an issue where you can parse the conversation … or decide if it was Mayor Dickert talking or Candidate Dickert talking,” Letteney said. “But in any event, judge, the City of Racine Common Council made a decision to defend Mayor Dickert in this lawsuit … That by itself may be enough for you to decide that the settlement agreement was a record under the public records law. The residents of the city of Racine paid for this litigation.”

After consulting open records statutes and reading instructions meant to guide jurors in determining when an elected official is acting in his or her official capacity, Ptacek said he was satisfied that Dickert was acting in his official capacity through when he made the comments.

“He was speaking based upon knowledge he obtained as mayor,” Ptacek said. “He was speaking about a person who was an employee of the city of Racine … and thus, in that regard … he was acting in his official capacity as mayor.”

OF course , The Judge Ptacek’s Order was OBJECTED to….

d2

Even Judge Ptacek doesn’t sound very convincing or positive,  when discussing John Dickert’s status while campaigning:  “He was speaking based upon knowledge he obtained as mayor,” Ptacek said. “He was speaking about a person who was an employee of the city of Racine … and thus, in that regard … he was acting in his official capacity as mayor.”

Yet earlier, Judge Schroeder DENIED John Dickert’s Motion for summary judgement when the decision rested upon John Dickert’s status! Which means that it is highly likely that the ONLY REASON John Dickert’s personal legal bills have been paid for is because “the City of Racine Common Council made a decision to defend Mayor Dickert in this lawsuit.”

Justice and Closure for residents who are being required by the Common Council, possibly in error,  and in light of the OBJECTION filed by Attorney Santarelli DEMANDS that the Racine Common Council seek a proper ruling as to the legal status of John Dickert and end their voluntary concession to pay John Dickert’s legal bills.

From: Of Two Minds by Charles Hugh Smith

The Lifecycle of Bureaucracy   (December 2, 2010)

All bureaucracies share a lifecycle of growth, self-protection and implosion.

bureaucracy

Survey Says….

From the April 15 City of Racine Common Council Meeting.  Click on Images to enlarge. Click on RED words for links. The review of the report entitled “Racine Economic Development Project Opportunities” – Chairman John Dickert. “Received and Filed” to avoid any discussion or opposition. It’s the Mayor’s new stealth spending program because voters rejected the 5% yearly increase which would have funded this.Rootworks

From the Racine Economic Development Project Opportunities report, which was:

Survey 2

With the goal of validating and continuing  the FAILED Tax and Develop Real Estate Speculation games and strategy  of City Hall

survey says 2

Comes the conclusion that: (Surprise! Surprise!)

survey says 3

Despite the tens of millions of $$$ already thrown into the Black Hole of Racine’s Downtown/Lakefront, Racine’s excessive number of  TID’s, some of which are failing, coupled with the  recent budget cuts and layoffs…..

survey says 4

survey says 5

The poison pill of continuing to fund Racine’s RDA failures is now  to be conducted in secret, completely  behind the scenes, so the Suckers who are paying  residents are left out of the process and believe that City Hall’s cuts in services means a cut in spending.

behind the scenes

Rootworks was developed by:

survey says 6

Do you know what a CIRCLE JERK is? Click on the image to enlarge and note that the same people that are on Rootworks Redevelopment Team also comprise the Racine Economic Development Project Opportunities.

survey 9

In Racine, Failure justifies MORE failure and speculation!

The City of Racine Planner, Brian O’Connell rejects Tom Tousis multi-million dollar West Racine project. The Racine Planning Department managed to get $5 million invested in property worth about $45,000.00; and now is trying to recover that money with one project. The problem is that the free market will not support such a price. The basic problem is that the City Bureaucrats are engaging in real estate speculation, an enterprise in which they are not qualified to engage. George Meyers explains why and pleads with the City Aldermen to get the City out of the speculation game.

delta hawk

Where’s the JOBS, Johnny?? Delta Hawk already got the $1.2M.

$1.2M on Delta Hawk – Was it a Good Investment?

Another element of the Racine Economic Development Project Opportunities goes into motion. (Previous projects included streetlight reductions and raising recycling fees)

City looking for festival, park cleanup help

April 22, 2013 from The JT:

RACINE — When aldermen voted to eliminate three vacant positions in the city’s Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Department a week ago, Parks Superintendent Mike Willis said the cuts would have a number of ramifications. “As a result of all the cuts we have been endured, we will be short-staffed this summer on things we take for granted; parade route and beach cleanup after the 4th, park detail and so forth,”

And while funding for the Library, Personnel, Public Works and Streetlights gets cut, Downtown Businessmen like Doug Nicholson and Joey LeGath make sure Bar Owners get $funding$ for their Facade Grants, and Micah Waters gets his $1.1M Plus.

INT 1

INT 2

Believe! Because this time it will be different!

shining

From of two minds.com   by charles hugh smith:

The Eroding Premium on Truth and Trust   (April 11, 2013)

The premium in America has shifted from truth to self-serving distortion, and from trust to manipulation.

The premium we place on truth and trustworthiness is self-evident. Truth is uniquely productive feedback from the real world. Truth (including factual data) is indispensable, for it alone enables us to correct errors, learn from mistakes and improve our effectiveness and communication.

We pay a premium for trust because the cost of dishonesty and artifice is steep. Would you pay more to buy a used car from someone you trust? If you place no premium on trustworthiness, then you buy the “great deal” used car you found online: oops, the “new” battery was spray-painted black, the crankcase leaks, the engine is shot and doesn’t pass smog, and the certificate of ownership is forged.

The premium on truth and trust is eroding under the constant onslaught of officially manipulated data and markets, and a vast array of distortions and propaganda designed to serve the interests of ruling Elites and key constituencies.

We all know the negative premium placed on fact: telling the truth will get you fired. And not just in the corporate world: politicians from the President on down all worship at the altar of the carefully distorted unemployment rate.

The officially sanctioned lying and manipulation are now shameless. Never mind that millions of people have become statistical phantoms (i.e. not in the workforce) to generate that low rate, and college graduates working 3 hours a day (if they’re called in at all) are gleefully counted as employed, as if there is no difference between a full-time job and a marginal one.

President Obama is touting rising auto sales as proof of the “recovery” (and implicitly, of his wise stewardship), studiously avoiding the fact that these stupendous auto sales are the result of offering low-interest rate auto loans to marginal borrowers with near-zero collateral (i.e. skin in the game).

How did blowing a credit bubble and securitizing the debt turn out last time?

Manipulation and carefully crafted distortion erode trust, not just in the individuals employed to repeat the lies but in the institutions that issue them. The ruthless pursuit of self-interest is now the norm; truth is a terribly risky disruptor that must be hidden, masked or countered with plausible lies.

As a nation, we’re like the obese person who looks at himself in the mirror and sees his body as normal–the distortion of truth is so complete that we literally no longer recognize reality. Untruth no longer arouses any moral indignation; we are either too jaded to care, or our moral compass now spins aimlessly from one manipulation to the next.

There can be no trust if there is no truth. How can we trust people who lie to us constantly, who issue one self-serving justification after another for their own parasitic predation? We cannot. How can we trust institutions whose credibility now rests on the continuation of lies that are so embedded in our financial sector and State that their collapse will bring down the entire house-of-cards debtocracy? We cannot.

The premium in America has shifted from truth to self-serving distortion, and from trust to manipulation. This spiritual and moral rot will end gloriously, have no doubt, for the stock market’s permanent ascendancy dissolves all other narratives.

Mayor Dickert  Cuts These Services:

cuts 1cuts 2

While Money is Spent on THIS:

April 23, 2013 from The JT:

RACINE — On Monday the City started a sweeping Downtown tree project that will bring about 100 new and replacement trees to that area. In addition to a total of 69 replacements, the City will also add about 30 trees at new spots in Downtown, Koepnick said. Many of them will be on Gas Light Drive. Another project near Downtown will be to replace all 25 ash trees along the bike path and Pershing Drive, Koepnick continued. That stretch will also get about 20 additional trees.

revenue

The George Meyers Show:

A discussion about the City Of Racine’s bidding practice’s and local government.

Ethics 1

Doug Nicholson (the bald, rotund figure in a powder puff blue shirt) complains!

ethics 2

ethics 4

ethics 7

Link to Video HERE.

Fire On High

Community Dilemma

Is it time to start sending tax exempt properties a  bill for services that are rendered?

From The JT

RACINE — The Racine Fire Department continues to investigate what started the Easter fire at 1709 W. Sixth St. that caused extensive damage and killed two family pets. Fire crews saw heavy smoke and flames as they approached the scene. Both the exterior and interior of the home were heavily engulfed in fire. Fire crews quickly knocked down the exterior fire, then concentrated efforts on the interior.

While it was fortunate that no people were hurt, and the loss of the pets is sad, this house, along with others in the City, is owned by the Racine Mutual Housing  Housing Association, a 501-c3 non profit organization that claims tax exempt status on their properties. In other words – they pay NO property tax. According to their IRS Form 990 they “provide quality housing to low income families and individuals, and improving inefficient, deteriorating homes in low income neighborhoods.“  NOW – there services are  not free, they charge rent ,  make a profit and compensate Officers! Clicking on images will Sharpen and Enlarge images:

Racine Mutual Housing Assn

2011 form 990

Line 8 lists the  Executive Director as Scott McClelland who claims to average 25 hours per week working for this non-profit organization. He was paid $19,535, or around $15/hr. Scott McClelland isn’t a nobody, he is another well connected Downtown businessman and has been involved in many prominent Downtown organizatrions.

Linda Young is also an Executive Director and she claims to average around 25 hours per week working for this non-profit organization. She was paid $11,742, along with a nontaxable amount of $1578 for a total of $13,320, or around $10.25/hr.

Here is a portion of  the 2011 Revenue sheet from the IRS Form 990, along with the Assets listing. In 2011, housing revenues were $136,983. The value of Land owned is listed at $65,862  and the value of buildings  owned is $1,1843,346, before depreciation.  No taxes are paid on these revenues, lands, or buildings.

housing revenue

buildings

Here is a look at Racine Mutual Housing Associations gross receipts – totaling $817,209 from 2007-2011. Note that the “public support”  is almost 100%.

Total Support

Low income people still pay rent! HOWEVER, Racine Mutual Housing Association claims 501-c3 status and is TAX-EXEMPT – which means they don’t pay property tax on those houses or income tax on rents received! That means that they don’t pay for Police, Fire, Sanitation or regular street maintenance.  However, they may receive special assessments for additional services that they ARE required to pay. The house which had the fire was at 1709 Sixth St. Here is what a Tax-Exempt property record looks like.

1709 SIxth St.

Even though the Racine Mutual Housing Association is General Property Tax -Exempt, they are still liable for special assessments. Those MUST be paid. However, Racine Mutual Housing Association has chosen NOT to pay them. Note that the billing address for RMHA is listed as 822 Park Ave – which is their correct business address. Here is the City Bill for 2010:

1709 Sixth St. tax bill

Why is Racine Mutual Housing Association choosing to NOT pay the special assessments it receives from the City of Racine, yet, choosing to pay  it’s Executive Directors Scott McClelland and Linda Young?  Why is this organization being allowed to maintain it’s Tax-Exempt status and why are they not being presented with a bill – for the cost of Fire and Police services rendered during the March 31, 2013 fire? Isn’t it fair – that a tax exempt organization, which doesn’t pay for services – is billed for services when it requires them, AND then be expected to pay that bill?

I wondered – what other properties does the Racine Mutual Housing Association own – and found the following. The list may not include ALL properties – this is just those I found:

822 Park Ave.

822 Park Ave

1236 Memorial Dr.1236 Memorial Dr

1518 Ann St.

1518 ann st a

428 Cliff Ave.

428 cliff ave a

1512 May St.

1512 May St.

821 Villa St.

821 Villa St.

While Racine Mutual Housing Association may not pay it’s special assessments – for services rendered – it does expect it’s tenants to pay rent – and evicts them for non- payment.

Racine mutual housing association 2

Racine mutual housing suit

What you can do:

1. Contact your Alderman and ask that Racine Mutual Housing Association be billed for all costs incurred for responding to, and extinguishing the fire along with  any subsequent additional services, provided  at 1709 W. Sixth St. You can also request that the Tax-Exempt status for Racine Mutual Housing Association parcels be re-considered, as they have failed to pay their special assessments despite being granted the generous special privilege of being Tax-Exempt from general property taxes.  Also ask your Alderman to consider an  Ordinance that would require tax-exempt organizations to pay for City Services when they are rendered.

2. Provide the Common Council with a written communication per City Ordinance Sec. 2-108

(a) All ordinances, resolutions, memorials, petitions, remonstrances and other communications of the common council shall be in writing with the name of the alderman or person presenting the same endorsed thereon, and shall be delivered to the clerk.

(b) Ordinances and resolutions, when being presented by the clerk to the common council, shall be presented by the name of the sponsor or sponsors and number unless requested to be read in full or required by law to be read in their entirety.

(c) Memorials, petitions, remonstrances, and other communications shall be presented by the clerk to the common council in summary form and include a designation of the person or persons presenting or sponsoring the same.

AND City Ordinance 2-117

(a)  All memorials, petitions, remonstrances and other communications shall be presented to the city clerk for presentation to the mayor and common council for their consideration and recommendation and/or referral to a committee or department.

(b) In the best interest of the city, petitions or other communications may be directed to a standing committee, provided there has been prior approval given by the chairman of the standing committee to which the direct referral is sought. The committee chairman may request a statement of the reasons supporting the request for a direct referral. It is the intent of the common council that direct referrals are not encouraged and should be used only when communication to the common council is impossible or impractical.

(c)  Every committee report on a petition or other communication which has been directly referred to a standing committee, when reported out to the common council, shall reflect the fact that the petition or communication was a direct referral to the committee rather than a referral to the committee by the common council.

EXAMPLE – suitable for copying:

From:

Date:

RE: Racine Mutual Housing Association

To the City of Racine Common Council I Respectfully Submit,

That on March 31, 2013, there was a residential fire at 1709 W.Sixth St. which is  owned by  Racine Mutual Housing Association, a tax-exempt organization. The  City of Racine provided Fire and Police services. As the RMHA is exempt from paying general property taxes, I am asking that they are billed for all services provided. Further, Racine Mutual Housing Association owes back taxes for special assessments at 1709 W. Sixth St., 822 Park Ave., 1236 Memorial Dr., 1518 Ann St., 428 Cliff Ave., 1512 May St., and 821 Villa St. In light of those facts, I am asking that the City Council consider removing the tax exempt status from those parcels.   I am also asking that the City Council create an Ordinance that would require tax-exempt parcels to be billed for City Services that are provided to them.

Sincerely,

3. File a complaint with the IRS and ask that their 501-c3 status be revoked as they have not been good stewards in the Community and have failed to pay their special assessments.

For IRS Form 13909 Tax-Exempt Organization Complaint Form, Click HERE

IRS complaint 1

IRS complaint 2